What this covers
- Criticality ranking — a consistent scoring framework applied across the asset base.
- Failure mode identification — the realistic ways each asset fails in your operating environment.
- Effects analysis — local effect, system effect and end effect for each mode.
- Consequence categories — safety, environmental, production, and repair cost assessed separately.
- Detectability — whether a failure gives warning, and whether current monitoring would catch it.
- Risk prioritisation — a ranked register that drives where to spend next.
- Spares implications — which failure modes justify holding critical spares.
What you receive
- FMECA worksheets for the assets in scope
- Criticality ranking with the scoring basis documented
- Prioritised risk register
- Recommendations on monitoring, spares and mitigation
Standards and references
Analysis follows IEC 60812 for FMEA and FMECA technique, supported by ISO 14224 for equipment taxonomy and reliability data where oil and gas assets are in scope.
Related services
RCM Strategy Development
Risk-based maintenance strategy built around how each asset actually fails.
Maintenance Program Optimization
Refining an existing maintenance framework to cut waste and redirect effort.
System-Wide Reliability Strategy
Reliability strategy across power systems, protection equipment and rotating machinery.
Need criticality & fmeca analysis scoped?
Work directly with the engineers doing the analysis — clear scoping from the first conversation.
Get in Touch